The Fiscal Duality of Mega-Sporting Events
Author: Vihaan Bakshi (Research Executive)
Introduction
Mega-events are often pursued by countries as a means of enhancing tourism, global recognition and improved infrastructure, believing the economic return on such investments to be highly beneficial. However, the reality is a complex interplay of various factors and tells a different story. Although events like the Olympics or the FIFA World Cup bolster short-term and immediate economic benefits, they also create long-term social costs that have adverse effects. This essay explores the polarity within the economics of mega sports events, illustrating how the alluring nature of such grandiose events leads to damaging financial costs.
Short-term Economic Boosts
The core ideology behind hosting mega-events is that they lead to a huge surge in tourism and job creation. This was evident in the recent 2024 Paris Olympics and the 2024 UEFA Euro Cup in Germany. The French government noted that international tourism rose by 13%, with 1.7 million foreign visitors. Similarly, the 2018 World Cup in Russia reportedly brought over three million tourists. The UEFA Euro Cup generated an impact of over €7.4 billion in Germany alone. This caters to a rise in income for local businesses and creates temporary employment. The local economy experiences a short boost due to a rise in jobs in hospitality, transportation, construction and retail sectors. This increases the scope for future tourism in those countries as well, thanks to increased global visibility and, oftentimes, positive word-of-mouth. Cultural and brand positioning, and the enhancement of infrastructure can attract a wider range of tourists. Nevertheless, these gains may well be overstated as the short-term spikes in GDP often lead to a spiralling bout of disappearing jobs and a sudden decrease in growth.
Long-term Economic Impact
The host nations are left with a bitter aftertaste once the short-term economic benefits die down. A prime example is the 2004 Athens Olympics which hastened the process of financial ruin for Greece. The 2016 Rio Olympics, similarly, created a challenging financial situation for the Brazilian economy. Many of the constructed stadiums required heavy investment but were reduced to nothing more than ‘white elephants’ - underused yet too expensive to maintain. The FIFA World Cup in Brazil just two years prior also proved that the costs of such infrastructural facilities seldom translated into sustained economic development. Local stakeholders feel the financial brunt as inflated public spending is diverted away from essential services such as education or healthcare. The post-event economic contraction fails to meaningfully materialise and challenges the initial narrative of prosperity.
Social and Financial Costs
Local communities also bear the adverse impact and social costs associated with hosting mega-events. Infrastructural projects such as those associated with Euro 2024 lead to large-scale displacements in key redevelopment areas. During the Rio Olympics, slum areas were cleared to make way for new stadiums. More than 77,000 people were displaced from their homes, especially in poor communities and ‘favelas’. Such atrocities raised ethical concerns about social inequalities and whether short-term entertainment should be put above communal welfare. Moreover, the financial investments are derived from vital sectors like education. This perpetuates a system where the nation celebrates its grandeur on an international stage but neglects the long-term repercussions of strain on social welfare. The high cost of the Rio Olympic Games created dissent in the population. Thousands took to the streets to express their discontent and argue that the money be used for healthcare and education. The protests grew to the level that the police had to resort to using tear gas and pepper spray.
Conclusion
Thus, hosting mega-events can be quite attractive, but their prevailing after-effects reveal their dark side. The economic uplift and global prestige are temporary but it may take quite some time for a country to pull itself out of the dire financial and social ramifications. The paradoxical nature of these events should push nations to weigh their glamour against the deep-rooted economic challenges that succeed them.
References
Barrios, D., Russell, S., & Andrews, M. (2016). Bringing home the gold? A review of the economic impact of hosting mega-events.
Maennig, W., & Zimbalist, A. (Eds.). (2012). International handbook on the economics of mega sporting events. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930279
Matheson, Victor. (2006). Mega-Events: The effect of the world's biggest sporting events on local, regional, and national economies. International Association of Sports Economists, Working Papers.
The economic effect of hosting mega sports events in developing countries—International affairs forum. https://www.ia-forum.org/Content/ViewInternal_Document.cfm?contenttype_id=1&ContentID=9586
The economic impact of hosting large sporting events | HLB. (2024, September 11). https://www.hlb.global/the-economic-impact-of-hosting-large-sporting-events/
writing, I. (n.d.). The Economics behind the Paris Olympics and other major summer events. Julius Baer. https://www.juliusbaer.com/en/insights/market-insights/markets-explained/the-economics-of-the-paris-olympics-and-other-major-events/
Zimbalist, A. (2016). The organization and economics of sports mega-events. 2016(3), 110–111. https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2016/number/3/article/the-organization-and-economics-of-sports-mega-events.html